Can someone explain this grammar?

English grammar and usage issues

Moderator: Joe

jw34
Member
Posts: 10
Joined: 05 Oct 2018, 10:31
Status: Teacher

Can someone explain this grammar?

Unread post by jw34 »

I’m thinking about how Constable must have felt when painting the Haywain.

This was a fill the gap exercise I gave my students. Both verbs had to be completed. Some students wrote:

I’m thinking about how Constable must have felt when he was painting the Haywain.

But some students omitted the 'he was'. This (latter) version sounds better to me but I can't work out what form painting is here.

Is it the Present Participle? Or a reduced form of the Past Continuous? I don't think it is the gerund.

Thanks.
Alfonso54
Member
Posts: 4
Joined: 25 Jul 2023, 07:14
Status: New Teacher

Re: Can someone explain this grammar?

Unread post by Alfonso54 »

Hello,
The phrase "when painting the Haywain" in the sentence "I’m thinking about how Constable must have felt when painting the Haywain" is a reduced form of the Past Continuous tense. Specifically, it is a reduced form of the Past Continuous tense in an adverbial clause.

The complete form of the sentence in the Past Continuous tense would be:

"I’m thinking about how Constable must have felt when he was painting the Haywain."

In the reduced form, the subject "he" and the auxiliary verb "was" are omitted, and the verb "painting" remains. This reduction is possible because the subject "he" is the same as the subject in the main clause ("I’m thinking"), and the action of "painting the Haywain" is happening at the same time as the thinking, making it unnecessary to repeat the subject and auxiliary verb.

So, both versions are grammatically correct:

"I’m thinking about how Constable must have felt when he was painting the Haywain." (Complete form)
"I’m thinking about how Constable must have felt when painting the Haywain." (Reduced form)
The second version (the reduced form) is commonly used in informal or spoken language, and it sounds more natural and concise. Both forms convey the same meaning, but the reduced form is often preferred for its brevity.
jw34
Member
Posts: 10
Joined: 05 Oct 2018, 10:31
Status: Teacher

Re: Can someone explain this grammar?

Unread post by jw34 »

Hi Alfonso

Thanks. That makes sense.
leon99
Rising Star
Posts: 28
Joined: 14 Sep 2023, 17:59
Status: Other

Re: Can someone explain this grammar?

Unread post by leon99 »

In the sentence "I’m thinking about how Constable must have felt when painting the Haywain," the word "painting" is a present participle. This construction is an example of a reduced adverbial clause.
moriswayne
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: 22 Oct 2023, 10:20
Status: Teacher

Re: Can someone explain this grammar?

Unread post by moriswayne »

reduced form is better to write, but little bit hard to understand...
Post Reply