How do you interpret this sentence?

English grammar and usage issues

Moderator: Joe

wizard
Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 03 Jul 2010, 12:27
Status: New Teacher

How do you interpret this sentence?

Unread post by wizard »

We were debating how to interpret this sentence:

I have served as human resources director for three firms, most recently ABC Company, where I was hired to create an HR department for a startup that had quickly grown to more than 150 employees.

Would you understand that he was hired AFTER the startup already had 150 employees, or was he hired and THEN the startup grew to 150 thanks to his efforts?

Thank you!
josef
Admin
Posts: 107
Joined: 13 Mar 2004, 17:52
Status: Other

Re: How do you interpret this sentence?

Unread post by josef »

I would understand that he was hired AFTER the startup already had 150 employees. That is the function of the past perfect (had...grown) in this case.
User avatar
Lucy
Top Contributor
Posts: 658
Joined: 13 Jan 2004, 15:09
Status: Teacher Trainer

Re: How do you interpret this sentence?

Unread post by Lucy »

I agree with TN (as always!)
jirkux
Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 02 Jan 2007, 10:43
Status: Other

Re: How do you interpret this sentence?

Unread post by jirkux »

I agree with Josef: When he was hired the company had already grown to 150 (and he had to look after them). That's the way I see it...
cucullin
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 20:37
Status: Trainee Teacher

Re: How do you interpret this sentence?

Unread post by cucullin »

He was employed after. When he joined the business had already grown to 150 employees and he was the man now looking after them.
royalina
Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 25 Jan 2011, 07:15
Status: Trainee Teacher

Re: How do you interpret this sentence?

Unread post by royalina »

I would understand that he was hired AFTER the startup already had 150 employees. .................
amrifa
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 03 Feb 2011, 14:59
Status: Prospective Teacher

Re: How do you interpret this sentence?

Unread post by amrifa »

From this sentence, I understand that the company had quickly grown to more than 150 employees before he had got there and was therefore needed in that job position to create that HR department. In this sentence, had is used in the past perfect which shows and suggests that it was something that happened in the past before he arrived and was employed. The startup growing had nothing to do with him or his efforts. His being hired was a result of a startup that had grown too large and needed to be managed (but I can see why this sentence would cause someone to read it a few times before fully understanding).
TallMikeV
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 03 Feb 2011, 14:36
Status: Trainee Teacher

Re: How do you interpret this sentence?

Unread post by TallMikeV »

It sounds that he was hired AFTER the startup already had 150 employees as well.

The use of the past perfect (Had grown) is there to express that something happened in the past, before somethign else in a nearer past.

In other words, it says "I was hired" which means this would be the closest past situation in the sentence. The past perfect tense ("had grown") puts emphasis on something prior to the closest past situation (the hiring). If the verb "grown" would've been in the perfect tense (has grown), then it would mean that the department would've expanded to 150 because of this newdirector. I hope it helps.
Post Reply