HAS or HAVE

[cosmo]

Which would you say?

1. I'm sorry that it's you who has to tell her.

2. I'm sorry that it's you who have to tell her.

All of my native English speaking friends are saying "has", but some ESL friends are saying this is gramatically incorrect and that it should be "have".

Is it one of those that hangs in the creative melting pot of wordage betwix slang and acceptable yet unquestioned grammar, perhaps?

[jasminade]

In this case, the "who" is related to "it's" and not the "I", nor the "you".
Therefore the use of the 3rd person singular is correct.

[Peter Easton]

It all depends on whether 'you' is plural or not.

[bambang]

Dear Jasminade and Peter.

Could you give more examples so that it would be more clear to me.

Thanks in advance for your help.

[shlee]

The use of has or have in the sentence is a curious sentence...jasminade is right for the reasons she stated...

As a practical matter of speech I often try saying the word phrase to myself to see which it most appropriate. For example, just say this,

you has to... and you have to...

You will quickly hear the difference as you say them

Now say this,

it has to... and it have to...

Again, you can hear the difference.

Regarding the pronoun you which can be used as a first or second person reference either singular or plural, I think has would not fit regardless of whether you is in the singular or plural form.

In regards to using it as an object pointing to the pronoun you. I just think using it when referring to people is a bad habit that has developed over many years. I never use it as a form of pronoun reference, and neither do I allow my students to use the word in that way...

[Peter Easton]

The following examples are all grammatically correct in using a 's' on the verb because 'it' is the subject, not 'you'.

'It's you who wants ice cream, not me.'
'It's you who likes this music, not me.'
'It's you who knows the way. I'm not familiar with this place.'


The only time you could drop the 's' on the verb with the syntax 'it's you who [verb]' is when the 'you' is plural. For example:

'It is you, the people, who have the chance to vote for Mr Brown in next week's election!'

[bambang]

Thank you very much for the explaination Peter.

It's very clear to me now.

[matthau]

It is you that has to tell her.
It is you who have to tell her.

Similar cleft sentences:
It is me that is wrong.
It is I who am wrong.

[Peter Easton]

I hope the two previous posters are not language teachers.

[matthau]

Peter,

The difference between 'It is I who am wrong' and 'It is me that is wrong' is merely stylistic.
The form of the verb 'to be' in the subbordinate clause depends upon the predicative pronoun in the principal clause, and has nothing to do with the formal subject 'It'.

[Peter Easton]

I know but that has nothing to do with the original post.

[matthau]

Actually, it does.
This whole confusion occurs because the pronoun 'you' has the same form for the nominative and the objective case. That's why the singular-plural fluctuations of the verb in the subordinate clause may seem strange.
(1) It is you who has to tell her.
(2) It is you who have to tell her.
The distinction becomes obvious when you take a personal pronoun which has different case forms, for example, 'I'.
(3) It is me who is wrong.
(4) It is I who am wrong.
Number (3) is built up on the same pattern as (1), and (4) is similar to (2). Stylistically, (1) and (3) are informal. (That's why to use 'that' as a relative pronoun instead of 'who' would be consistent).

[Peter Easton]

Fair enough. Sentence 2 is not incorrect but it sounds odd. Personally, I would never say it.

[odyssey]

I'm sorry that it's you that has to tell her.

Every time. Singular or plural.

[systematic]

I'm sorry that it's you that has to tell her.

Every time. Singular or plural.

Except when the relative pronoun (who or that) is a plural subject pronoun and relates to a plural subject.

Thus, in addressing a crowd:
I'm sorry that it's you that have to tell her.
[that being the subject, and not you]

BTW, that is incorrect in your example, and should be who...

Murphy (1990); Eastwood (1992)