ThirdView wrote:Said ThirdView:...If your strategy results in Max, Karl, or Arthur being fired or changing their behavior, without you losing your job, I will gladly accept your criticism.
johnpz wrote:truthiness: I sent you a pm with some pertinent information that you requested.
I've been reading this forum for a while now. I'd like to know:
1. What kind of evidence leads to the belief that Magick is involved with drugs? I have been there a few times a never seen,smelled, heard about it.
AS FAR AS I KNOW, MAGICK CAFE ISN'T, AND HAS NEVER BEEN, A PLACE TO GET DRUGS. THERE IS ZERO EVIDENCE OF THIS I'M SURE. I HAVE SAID ZERO AGAINST THE MAGICK CAFE. I HOPE IT THRIVES DESPITE KARL WANG.
2. Where is the proof that Karl is embezzling money? He has apts in Huadu? The truth or rumours?
I KNOW NOTHING OF HIS APARTMENTS. THEY ARE NOT MY BUSINESS. ACTUALLY, I DO HAVE PROOF HE WAS EMBEZZLING MONEY, OR AT LEAST PARTIAL PROOF. I HAVE PROOF MONEY WAS BEING STOLEN FROM A TEACHER. I WILL NOT SHARE THE DETAILS HERE. SORRY. I WISH I COULD. BUT I'M NOT GOING TO REVEAL THE IDENTITY OF A VICTIM. I APOLOGIZE FOR NOT SHARING THE EVIDENCE, AND I KNOW I WILL GET FLAK FOR NOT COUGHING IT UP. I'M NOT MAKING THIS UP. THE EVIDENCE ISN'T ALL OVER THE INTERNET BECAUSE THE SYSTEM IN CHINA ISN'T GOING TO PURSUE IT. PARTIALLY POSITIVE RESULTS WERE ACHIEVED. I APOLOGIZE, BUT THAT'S AS OPAQUE AS I CAN GET.
3. The Truth is "in the loop" with FEB and PSB officials? I'm baffled how a foreigner can be "in the loop" especially when he/she doesn't speak Chinese. Elaborate please.
WHY SHOULD I ELABORATE? WHAT WOULD I KNOW ABOUT THAT? I DON'T CARE ABOUT THAT. I DON'T THINK THE TRUTH IS IN THE LOOP AND I DON'T CARE. THE TRUTH IS OBVIOUSLY SOMEONE WHO KNOWS SOME THINGS ABOUT CHINA. SO WHAT? I PARTIALLY AGREE WITH HIS VIEWS. I JUST THINK HE IS A BIT TOO HARSH OR EXTREME AGAINST THE FOREIGN TEACHERS. HE MUST HAVE SEEN LOTS OF DRUGGED-OUT FOREIGNERS. ALCOHOLICS ARE ANOTHER REASON NOT TO COME TO PZ.
With all due respect, please back up accusations with some kind of proof. I'm reading this forum for information and I'm sure other people are too. Accusations without proof and personal conversations shouldn't really be posted on the public forum, in my opinion.
A LOT OF WHAT YOU ARE MENTIONING HERE DOESN'T COME FROM MY POSTINGS. PLEASE ASK THE OTHER POSTERS. I RESPECT YOUR OPINION AND AGREE WITH YOU. BUT POSTINGS WITHOUT PROOF SUPPLIED WOULD LEAVE US WITH ONLY THE VIDEO AS INDICATION THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG IN PEIZHENG, WHICH IS WHY I SUGGESTED THAT EVERYONE SEE THE VIDEO AND THAT EVERYONE ERASE WHAT THEY HAVE WRITTEN HERE IN THIS THREAD. YOU MAKE A VALID POINT.
ThirdView wrote:The Truth, Truthiness, and Puzzle Box. All 3 of you need to hit the edit button and delete most of your recent material. No one trying to make a decision about whether to work at Pei Zheng College is going to wade through all that stuff. They’re not interested in all this feuding. They just want to know the same thing you want to know when you consider a new school. They simply want to know about the experience of other teachers at the school.
ThirdView wrote:"What if we all said YOU, Teacher C, were unreasonable in your approach to admin?"
For anyone who considers my actions unreasonable, I refer to the previous semester, when Max was not a supervisor, and contrast it with the next semester, when Max was a supervisor. I have said it before and will say it again: no Max, no situation.
ThirdView wrote:“Arthur is Karl's boss and Karl is in dreadful fear of him, not the other way around.”
Arthur is in charge of the English Education Center, Karl is in charge of the Foreign Affairs Office. Academics is Arthur’s jurisdiction, employment is Karl’s jurisdiction. Karl decides whether you can teach there, Arthur decides what curriculum you teach. Neither of them answers to each other, both answer to the same vice president. Karl hires and fires, period.
Anyone who has been at the school as long as you have should be familiar with the distinction between these 2 offices.
truthiness wrote:ThirdView wrote:In short:
- I don't expect to change their behavio(u)r.
- I don't want to get fired because I can't afford it.
- I think that by exposing Karl and Max they might get fired eventually.
- I think they might not want to fire Max but will not renew his contract. I think he signed a two-year contract.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 9 guests