Why is the comparative: livelier but not widelier?

Help, tips and advice in teaching English. Classroom problems, lesson planning, career advice, staff...

Moderator: Susan

Why is the comparative: livelier but not widelier?

Unread postby Frauke » 03 Apr 2006, 16:47

Hello Lucy,

I was working on comparatives with my students (FCE) and we came across the following:

widely and more widely but
lively and livelier

My students asked me, why isn't it: widelier. They said, it didn't make sense to them; to be honest, it didn't make sense to me either.

Could you help me here to explain it to them? Thanks very much!

Frauke
Frauke
Registered Member
 
Posts: 5
Joined: 26 Nov 2005, 14:50
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Comparitives

Unread postby Lucy » 05 Apr 2006, 19:19

Dear Frauke,

I see what you mean; it does look confusing.

The explanation is that lively is an adjective but widely is an adverb.

To make comparatives of short adjectives (one syllable), as I’m sure you know, you add –er. Adjectives of two syllables that end in –y follow the same rule, for example, easier. For most other adjectives of two syllables, you use “more” to form the comparative, eg more polite.

However, with adverbs of two syllables that end in –ly, you use “more”. Other examples include more quickly (not quicklier) and more clearly (not clearlier).

I hope this clarifies things for you.

Best wishes,

Lucy
User avatar
Lucy
Moderator
 
Posts: 607
Joined: 13 Jan 2004, 16:09
Location: France
Status: Teacher Trainer


Return to TEFL Help Desk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 10 guests

cron