G8way_2_China wrote:I don't mean to go off on topical tangent and such a discussion is unlikely appropriate within the space of this particular forum,
I don't think that really matters here, there are not a lot of people following the thread, but for anyone that is, it is a healthy discourse, entertaining, and informative.
Again you have a very suspicious mind and try to interpret too much between my lines

What I meant is that my personal morals are based on Christian ethics, even if that may sound old fashioned in the modern world of agressive marketing methodology. When I have something to say, I tend usually to be embarrassingly direct and not hide behind linguistic tools. The education in ours schools is indeed nevertheless secular. The schools are Catholic only in their governance and management. 87% of the admin staff and teachers are Buddhist, and our programmes follow the Thai Ministry of Education's national curriculum. Far less gospel is preached in our schools than Buddhism is in the state schools, Christian devices, icons and statuary are absent from our classrooms, and native EFL teachers are expressly forbidden to proselytize. We do however give nearly 1/2 million kids and staff a couple of days off for Christmas to the envy of the populations of the state schools
Again, I can't see where I was 'bashing' anyone for selling franchises - franchising itself is a perfectly acceptable and well established form of commerce - but I'll be the first to bash anyone who sell a franchise - or anything else in the name of education - purely and solely for the sake of making a quick buck. The founder of one large chain of high street English language institutes freely admits to doing it, he studied the franchise system first, as a focus of his MBA, then returned to his native Thailand to look for a niche market to milk - but they do provide an honest product. Another chain (a rather large and tentacular global one based, I believe, in northern Europe), in contrast, has a rather disgusting adjenda, but the very fact that the franchisees are alone responsible for what goes on makes it difficult to put anyone behind bars, and that is of course one of the advantages of the system.
G8way_2_China wrote:Your non-commercial status (which in its purest form is, with all due respect, hardly feasible)
Almost right again, but it is a one way commerce, its costs us money to run, we don't make any out of it, and it is not our intention to do so. It may, as you say, not necessarily stand in the way of a possible collaboration.
G8way_2_China wrote: I'm sure you have a network of partners and/or reliable contacts who offer English training services to the public.
We don't, but 'partnerships' in the past have been considered and that is precisely why, with the gracious help of one of the world's leading establishments of higher education, we created our own department of English in our training faculty, and why I spend a lot of time in most of the countries of southeast Asia, India and Australia organising exchange programmes for teacher development.
Any suggestions you may have for leading Thailand out of the wilderness of corruption, would now indeed be unapropriate here and must needs be pursued
unter vier augen 