<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: English Today for free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tefl.net/alexcase/linguistics/english-today-for-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tefl.net/alexcase/linguistics/english-today-for-free/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Case</title>
		<link>http://www.tefl.net/alexcase/linguistics/english-today-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-8333</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tefl.net/alexcase/?p=4412#comment-8333</guid>
		<description>From an email from CUP

&quot;BTW, the price is actually £34/$54 for individuals this year (and the price remains the same next year). The higher price category of £116 is actually for institutional libraries and includes online access for multiple users. I&#039;d appreciate it if you would post a line about that on your blog as I wouldn&#039;t want your readers to be under the misconception that ET is that  expensive! Thank you for doing this. 

In case you or your readers want the link to those details, it&#039;s 
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ENG &quot;

I still think the way I wrote it was far more interesting, but was happy to give this correction as them not mentioning that 100 readers should be 100 editions shows they have some sense of humour</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From an email from CUP</p>
<p>&#8220;BTW, the price is actually £34/$54 for individuals this year (and the price remains the same next year). The higher price category of £116 is actually for institutional libraries and includes online access for multiple users. I&#8217;d appreciate it if you would post a line about that on your blog as I wouldn&#8217;t want your readers to be under the misconception that ET is that  expensive! Thank you for doing this. </p>
<p>In case you or your readers want the link to those details, it&#8217;s<br />
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ENG &#8221;</p>
<p>I still think the way I wrote it was far more interesting, but was happy to give this correction as them not mentioning that 100 readers should be 100 editions shows they have some sense of humour</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

