Another TEFL conspiracy theory proved
Wednesday, February 10th, 2010When people claim that there is a direct link between advertising and censorship on Rave Spelling’s ESL Au Lait, I’d always assumed that they were exaggerating and things were at least a little more subtle than that. Apparently not:
“I am initially interested in advertising and your rates are certainly attractive. However, one thing which I am concerned with is the amount of ‘hit jobs’ on your forum site from other schools.recently [EDITED] decided to comment on our courses, and I find this very unprofessional.
Could you please let me know how you decide something should be published online on your forum pages. I am not against freedom of speech and opinion but I definitely cannot agree with such ‘hit jobs’ and before we would agree to advertising we would need some assurance that there is a filter for such posts.
Thank you for your understanding and looking forward to hearing back from you soon.”
to which the person in charge replied
“Dear [EDITED],
We strive to allow free speech and maintain a neutral point of view in forums, meaning that any school or other entity is free to respond to comments by others. It appears that you have indeed responded… In extreme cases we are prepared to place a response directly in the body of the original post. If an offended entity can demonstrate precisely which words are untrue, we may expunge them.
Advertising and editorial are totally separate on TEFL.net and we never guarantee an advertiser anything concerning editorial content. Any decision to advertise is entirely the advertiser’s.
I do appreciate that certain posts may appear unprofessional, but we are not the arbiters of professionalism and believe that readers can judge for themselves. Otherwise put, an unprofessional post may actually do harm rather than good to its poster, which is obviously not the intention.
I hope this clarifies the position to your satisfaction.”
to which he or she replied
“Fair enough, here’s the cash for a main page banner”
Only joshing! In fact we got the old favourite:
“I’m afraid that in that case we will currently need to decline the offer of paid advertising as I just can’t see the value of a forum where a company can be blatantly disreputed and you should be aware of recent cases where companies have complained in a legal capacity and won damages as a result of cyber bullying (in the case of personal attacks), or libel (in the case of cyber attacks on a company).
Just placing a disclaimer on your site doesn’t mean that you can shirk responsibility and you might be the subject of court action.
I just want to let you know because it seems that inevitably the way your forum page direction is headed that this might be the case for you along the road at some point.”
and there it was left to lie. Oh, no, that’s just me being naive again. Apparently after that it “got messy” and I probably wouldn’t even want to see the emails from that point on. Will I perhaps be receiving some similiarly “messy” emails from Bad TEFL Dave (as opposed to Good TEFL Dave) for suggesting that he deals with these situations in a slightly different way to the middle email above?
For more on TEFL conspiracies:
Six rumours and conspiracies in ELT